I’ve been working as an embedded consultant within a school
serving students on the Autism Spectrum. It has been a creative adventure …
figuring out how to ‘marry’ Aided
Language Stimulation (ALgS) principles with an Applied Behavioral Analysis (ABA) approach. At first it seemed like an ‘apples’ and
‘oranges’ dilemma, but we have managed to make a rewarding ‘fruit salad’!
Within this setting we are using Animated Step-by-Steps™ to
address a literacy, language and AAC agenda. We are sucessfully building a
variety of functional extension activities that use ABA principles. Each
page/slide of an ASbyS resource has simple
text that is ‘sprinkled’ with stars that signal the presence of animations/sound effects that support
the text just read. You read a segment … then perform a click to trigger an
animation and continue until all the animations on a particular page have been
animated. If you are using a Regular ASbyS
(non symbol-supported), you will hear a chime when the page is fully completed.
With a Symbol-Supported ASbyS, the
corresponding picture symbols will appear as a group, AFTER all the page
animations have been completed. This strategy is designed to avoid ‘stealing
attention’ from the upfront literacy focus. Once the symbols appear, they are
available for ALgS, allowing you to discuss the page further, this time using
the symbols to support this discussion.
As ASbyS are highly structured and very predictable, they do
lend themselves well to monitoring many of the joint attention goals typically
addressed by the ABA therapist. The fact that many students on the spectrum are
enamored with technology seems to work to our advantage when using an ASbyS.
Here are just a few
of the questions to be answered re: attention/ performance when using an ASbyS.
Is the student watching the screen while you are pointing to
& reading the text?
If you are using a remote
switch to trigger the animations, is the process independent or facilitator-assisted
(offered at the appropriate time)?
Does the student interact appropriately with the remote switch? (gently pressing the
switch, as opposed to slapping the switch forcefully to activate the
animations). A prompt hierarchy may be necessary
to promote correct switch use.
Is the student watching the subsequent triggered animation?
Does the student visually follow the Aided Language Stimulation that is provided to promote further
discussion?
I’m sure there is more that can be documented, but this is
our initial ‘good start’.
Here is our current
data sheet ( a work in progress)
As you can see from the data sheet, you must document the name/initials of the Primary Facilitator, the Data Collector, and the name of the ASbyS that you are using. There is also an area to document whether you
are using a remote switch and
whether it is being used in an independent
(constantly available) vs. a facilitator-assisted
(offered) format. I do prefer to
use a remote switch when using an ASbyS as it ensures consistency of response across
the full spectrum of display formats that might be used as part of the
student’s individual and group therapeutic plan (iPad Pro, TV monitor,
interactive whiteboard).
Each row on the data sheet represents a page. Within a row
there are boxes that represent each sequential animation on that page.
Depending upon the page, you may or may not, use all the boxes in the row. In
the above illustration there are four animations/sound effects on page 4. On
the far right is a box (highlighted in blue) where you can document how well
the student visually follows the Aided Language Stimulation that is being
provided if you are using a symbol-supported version. When using an ALgS song,
this often assumes the form of singing the song while pointing to the symbols
(Note there is a song button in the upper left corner of the header). For other
ASbyS, this provides a conversational moment to disuss interactively what the
page revealed. Don’t forget … on the
iPad you can use the pinch to zoom out
feature to enlarge the symbols to promote greater attention.
Each ‘starred box’ reflects performance in three areas: 1.
attention to text (documented in the
area to the left of the star) … 2. interaction with remote switch (coded on the star) and … 3. attention to animation (documented in the area to
the right of the star). We’ve tried to keep the coding very simple: ✔
(attends to the first ___ seconds) vs. ✗ (does not attend to the first ____ seconds).
Obviously you can vary the number of upfront seconds required to qualify as a
success.
At the end of the session we are able to document
percentages, i.e., the number of successful trials divided by the total number
of opportunities that were provided within this resource.
For example:
Attention to Text: 53/116 (46%)
Interaction with
Switch: 100/116 appropriate (86%)
Attention to
Animation: 103/116 (89%)
Attention to
ALgS: 84/116 (72%)
Stay tuned for a future post commenting on functional extension activities that support both an ABA and AAC agenda.
Stay tuned for a future post commenting on functional extension activities that support both an ABA and AAC agenda.
…’til the next post … (new posts every Monday)
Visit my website http://www.animatedstep-by-steps.com
Follow me on twitter @AnimStepbySteps
Follow me on twitter @AnimStepbySteps
Follow me on facebook www.facebook.com/AnimatedStepBySteps
Follow my blog http://animatedstepbystep.blogspot.com
Email me canadiangoosse@gmail.com
Visit my digital store http://teacherspayteachers.com/Store/Bloom
©2016 Carol Goossens’, Ph.D.
Augmentative Communication Consultant
Speech-Language Pathologist
Special Educator
